🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of the president. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from disorder. While the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of debunking it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the country in practice.

• The shortlist included various figures, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. His harder version led Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. His influence is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.