🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from disorder. Although he is called a different name, the message is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of debunking it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to accept the role. The presidency was in essence a selection process with no shortage of candidates. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the country in practice.

• His list featured several politicians, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the events said the primary requirement was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as James Bond. The grittier interpretation led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor popular with viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. He is hinted at through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it might seek to examine.